<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 728 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the liability to pay service tax on goods transport agent (GTA) services. It was determined that before a specific notification dated 1.3.2008, individuals liable to pay service tax on GTA services could utilize credit for tax payment. The Tribunal found that the issue had been settled by previous decisions and therefore dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, as the period in question fell before the relevant notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 728 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the liability to pay service tax on goods transport agent (GTA) services. It was determined that before a specific notification dated 1.3.2008, individuals liable to pay service tax on GTA services could utilize credit for tax payment. The Tribunal found that the issue had been settled by previous decisions and therefore dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, as the period in question fell before the relevant notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>