<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 727 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207789</link>
    <description>After Note 4 to Chapter 87, body building, fabrication, or mounting of structures or equipment on a chassis is treated as manufacture of motor vehicles under Tariff Heading 87.02. Driver cabins and rear bodies fabricated or mounted on chassis were therefore not correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 87.07. The classification adopted by Revenue was held unsustainable, and the assessee succeeded on the classification issue; no differential duty was payable on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 727 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207789</link>
      <description>After Note 4 to Chapter 87, body building, fabrication, or mounting of structures or equipment on a chassis is treated as manufacture of motor vehicles under Tariff Heading 87.02. Driver cabins and rear bodies fabricated or mounted on chassis were therefore not correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 87.07. The classification adopted by Revenue was held unsustainable, and the assessee succeeded on the classification issue; no differential duty was payable on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>