<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 544 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207745</link>
    <description>Assessment framed in the name of an amalgamated and dissolved company is a jurisdictional defect, not a curable procedural irregularity under Section 292B; therefore Section 292B is inapplicable and such assessments are void. The decision explains that framing assessment against a non-existent entity goes to the root of jurisdiction because no assessment can validly be made against a dissolved person. Where returns were originally filed while the amalgamating company existed, the assessing officer may substitute the correct appellant as assessee and commence proceedings afresh by issuing notice under Section 143(2), provided that limitation or other bars do not preclude doing so.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 544 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207745</link>
      <description>Assessment framed in the name of an amalgamated and dissolved company is a jurisdictional defect, not a curable procedural irregularity under Section 292B; therefore Section 292B is inapplicable and such assessments are void. The decision explains that framing assessment against a non-existent entity goes to the root of jurisdiction because no assessment can validly be made against a dissolved person. Where returns were originally filed while the amalgamating company existed, the assessing officer may substitute the correct appellant as assessee and commence proceedings afresh by issuing notice under Section 143(2), provided that limitation or other bars do not preclude doing so.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>