<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 714 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207730</link>
    <description>An SSI unit availing a value-based exemption under the Central Excise Rules was excluded from the general requirement of fortnightly duty payment under Rule 173G(1)(a), so that payment schedule did not apply. A departmental circular could not override the express exclusion in the rule, and any contrary direction in the circular was ineffective. On that basis, the interest demand and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 714 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207730</link>
      <description>An SSI unit availing a value-based exemption under the Central Excise Rules was excluded from the general requirement of fortnightly duty payment under Rule 173G(1)(a), so that payment schedule did not apply. A departmental circular could not override the express exclusion in the rule, and any contrary direction in the circular was ineffective. On that basis, the interest demand and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>