<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 752 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207718</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of admitted tax liability, directing the CIT(A) to admit the appeal and decide on merit within three months. The Tribunal considered the impact of tax credits, payments made, and the attachment of bank accounts. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the assessment order was set aside for fresh consideration, with the stay petition being dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 752 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207718</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of admitted tax liability, directing the CIT(A) to admit the appeal and decide on merit within three months. The Tribunal considered the impact of tax credits, payments made, and the attachment of bank accounts. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the assessment order was set aside for fresh consideration, with the stay petition being dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>