<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 865 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207710</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 78 and directed the original authority to reexamine the claim of excess payment of Service Tax and interest, providing the appellants with a fair hearing opportunity. The Tribunal granted full benefit under Section 80, acknowledging the appellants&#039; lack of knowledge regarding Service Tax laws and the failure to claim an exemption of up to Rs.4 lakhs for the relevant year. The decision aimed to rectify the oversight and ensure a just outcome for the appellants in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 865 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207710</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 78 and directed the original authority to reexamine the claim of excess payment of Service Tax and interest, providing the appellants with a fair hearing opportunity. The Tribunal granted full benefit under Section 80, acknowledging the appellants&#039; lack of knowledge regarding Service Tax laws and the failure to claim an exemption of up to Rs.4 lakhs for the relevant year. The decision aimed to rectify the oversight and ensure a just outcome for the appellants in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>