<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 709 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207696</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the petition, directing the petitioner to engage with the Assessing Officer for further action within a specified timeframe. The court upheld the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s jurisdiction in issuing directions related to the section 10A deduction claim and arm&#039;s length pricing determination under the Income-tax Act. The decision emphasized the importance of thorough review and compliance with statutory provisions in resolving tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 709 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207696</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the petition, directing the petitioner to engage with the Assessing Officer for further action within a specified timeframe. The court upheld the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s jurisdiction in issuing directions related to the section 10A deduction claim and arm&#039;s length pricing determination under the Income-tax Act. The decision emphasized the importance of thorough review and compliance with statutory provisions in resolving tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>