<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 600 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207694</link>
    <description>HC held reassessment proceedings invalid for addition treating a gift as unexplained where the assessee filed a fresh return in response to a notice under s.148 but no notice under s.143(2) was issued thereafter. The court ruled the mandate of issuing notice u/s 143(2) after receipt of the fresh return is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with; absence of such notice vitiates the escaped assessment procedure. Decision rendered in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 600 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207694</link>
      <description>HC held reassessment proceedings invalid for addition treating a gift as unexplained where the assessee filed a fresh return in response to a notice under s.148 but no notice under s.143(2) was issued thereafter. The court ruled the mandate of issuing notice u/s 143(2) after receipt of the fresh return is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with; absence of such notice vitiates the escaped assessment procedure. Decision rendered in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>