<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207670</link>
    <description>Where a limitation finding on a show-cause notice remains unchallenged, the appellate forum cannot bypass that issue and decide the demand on merits. The text states that the six-month limitation under Rule 10(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 governed the demand, and a notice issued beyond that period could survive only if the extended period was lawfully invoked. Because the tribunal had not examined the validity of the extended period and the prior limitation finding stood undisturbed, the matter required fresh consideration confined to limitation, with merits left unexplored until that question was resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207670</link>
      <description>Where a limitation finding on a show-cause notice remains unchallenged, the appellate forum cannot bypass that issue and decide the demand on merits. The text states that the six-month limitation under Rule 10(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 governed the demand, and a notice issued beyond that period could survive only if the extended period was lawfully invoked. Because the tribunal had not examined the validity of the extended period and the prior limitation finding stood undisturbed, the matter required fresh consideration confined to limitation, with merits left unexplored until that question was resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>