<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 843 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207638</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal in Chennai set aside the denial of CENVAT credit due to documents being in the name of the head office and lack of proof of service in the assessee&#039;s unit. The Tribunal remitted the case for fresh adjudication, allowing the appeal by remand after considering arguments from both sides and waiving predeposit of duty and penalty. The judgment was pronounced in open court, concluding the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 843 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207638</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal in Chennai set aside the denial of CENVAT credit due to documents being in the name of the head office and lack of proof of service in the assessee&#039;s unit. The Tribunal remitted the case for fresh adjudication, allowing the appeal by remand after considering arguments from both sides and waiving predeposit of duty and penalty. The judgment was pronounced in open court, concluding the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>