<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 25 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207629</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to determine the tax effect and proceed accordingly. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal on both issues of disallowance of depreciation and excess claim of expenditure under interest due to the negligible tax effect and the total income remaining nil even after the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The decision was based on the applicable Instruction requiring a minimum tax effect of Rs. 2 lakhs for the appeal to be entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 25 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207629</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to determine the tax effect and proceed accordingly. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal on both issues of disallowance of depreciation and excess claim of expenditure under interest due to the negligible tax effect and the total income remaining nil even after the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The decision was based on the applicable Instruction requiring a minimum tax effect of Rs. 2 lakhs for the appeal to be entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>