<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 793 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207622</link>
    <description>The ITAT, Bangalore dismissed the appellant&#039;s Misc. petition, upholding previous decisions on deductions under sections 80HHC and 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, as well as the allocation of research and development expenses. The court rejected the appellant&#039;s contentions and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s directions, emphasizing that expenses should be allocated based on the actual benefit to the unit where research was conducted. The judgment was delivered on 16.2.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 793 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207622</link>
      <description>The ITAT, Bangalore dismissed the appellant&#039;s Misc. petition, upholding previous decisions on deductions under sections 80HHC and 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, as well as the allocation of research and development expenses. The court rejected the appellant&#039;s contentions and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s directions, emphasizing that expenses should be allocated based on the actual benefit to the unit where research was conducted. The judgment was delivered on 16.2.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>