<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 394 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the respondents are entitled to claim modvat credit on dies received on loan basis, as ownership is not a prerequisite for claiming credit on duty paid on capital goods. The Tribunal relied on previous decisions establishing that manufacturers can claim credit for capital goods regardless of ownership. The respondents were deemed eligible for the credit as they utilized the dies in manufacturing goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 394 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the respondents are entitled to claim modvat credit on dies received on loan basis, as ownership is not a prerequisite for claiming credit on duty paid on capital goods. The Tribunal relied on previous decisions establishing that manufacturers can claim credit for capital goods regardless of ownership. The respondents were deemed eligible for the credit as they utilized the dies in manufacturing goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>