<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 392 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207615</link>
    <description>CESTAT set aside the impugned orders confirming service tax and penalties under Sections 76 and 77 on discounts/incentives received by the appellant, an advertising agency. Relying on a coordinate Bench decision in an identical matter, it held that such discounts/incentives received from print media are not consideration for taxable services but merely trade discounts, and hence not liable under &quot;advertising agency&quot; services. Consequently, the same amounts cannot be reclassified and taxed under &quot;business auxiliary services&quot; as they do not constitute charges for any distinct service. Stay applications for waiver of pre-deposit were allowed and the appeals were allowed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 19:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 392 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207615</link>
      <description>CESTAT set aside the impugned orders confirming service tax and penalties under Sections 76 and 77 on discounts/incentives received by the appellant, an advertising agency. Relying on a coordinate Bench decision in an identical matter, it held that such discounts/incentives received from print media are not consideration for taxable services but merely trade discounts, and hence not liable under &quot;advertising agency&quot; services. Consequently, the same amounts cannot be reclassified and taxed under &quot;business auxiliary services&quot; as they do not constitute charges for any distinct service. Stay applications for waiver of pre-deposit were allowed and the appeals were allowed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>