<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 596 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207601</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal in a revenue dispute case, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, holding that the interest payable by the assessee should be deducted from the refund amount only after formal adjudication by the authority. The Court upheld the revenue&#039;s claim that the assessee was liable to pay interest on the duty amount from the date of adjudication until actual payment, rejecting the assessee&#039;s arguments to the contrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 596 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207601</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal in a revenue dispute case, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, holding that the interest payable by the assessee should be deducted from the refund amount only after formal adjudication by the authority. The Court upheld the revenue&#039;s claim that the assessee was liable to pay interest on the duty amount from the date of adjudication until actual payment, rejecting the assessee&#039;s arguments to the contrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>