https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207600 The tribunal upheld the orders confirming the demand and recovery of Cenvat credit, ruling that the credit availed was not lawful as the lamination process did not amount to manufacture under the Central Excise Act. The appellants' arguments regarding the interpretation of relevant rules and past judgments were dismissed, and they were directed to deposit 60% of the demanded amount within eight weeks, with interest and penalties waived pending appeal disposal. Compliance was required by 27-6-2011. en-us Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2011 07:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207600 The tribunal upheld the orders confirming the demand and recovery of Cenvat credit, ruling that the credit availed was not lawful as the lamination process did not amount to manufacture under the Central Excise Act. The appellants' arguments regarding the interpretation of relevant rules and past judgments were dismissed, and they were directed to deposit 60% of the demanded amount within eight weeks, with interest and penalties waived pending appeal disposal. Compliance was required by 27-6-2011. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207600