https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207599 The High Court of Delhi granted the writ petition, quashed the order of the Dispute Resolution Panel-II, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The court emphasized the importance of quasi-judicial authorities providing clear and relevant reasons for their decisions and directed the competent authority to consider the exclusion of time while computing the limitation for passing an assessment order. The judgment was delivered by Chief Justice Dipak Mishra and Justice Manmohan, with Mr. M.S. Syali representing the petitioner and Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal representing the revenue. en-us Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2016 14:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207599 The High Court of Delhi granted the writ petition, quashed the order of the Dispute Resolution Panel-II, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The court emphasized the importance of quasi-judicial authorities providing clear and relevant reasons for their decisions and directed the competent authority to consider the exclusion of time while computing the limitation for passing an assessment order. The judgment was delivered by Chief Justice Dipak Mishra and Justice Manmohan, with Mr. M.S. Syali representing the petitioner and Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal representing the revenue. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207599