https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207596 The Tribunal found that the Dispute Resolution Panel's order lacked specific reasoning and failed to address the assessee's objections adequately, following the Delhi High Court's precedent in Vodafone Essar Ltd. v. Dispute Resolution Panel-II. Consequently, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the DRP for a detailed order with specific reasoning, setting aside the assessment order and directing the AO to issue a new order in line with the revised directions. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay application was dismissed as proceedings were restored to the DRP. en-us Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207596 The Tribunal found that the Dispute Resolution Panel's order lacked specific reasoning and failed to address the assessee's objections adequately, following the Delhi High Court's precedent in Vodafone Essar Ltd. v. Dispute Resolution Panel-II. Consequently, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the DRP for a detailed order with specific reasoning, setting aside the assessment order and directing the AO to issue a new order in line with the revised directions. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay application was dismissed as proceedings were restored to the DRP. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207596