<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 697 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207592</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, confirming the addition of Rs. 1,78,74,364/- under Section 41(1)/28(iv) for AY 2007-08. The Tribunal held that the remission of liability, though not recognized as income from the project, was taxable as part of the trading activity. The Tribunal found that the remission accrued in the year under consideration and dismissed the assessee&#039;s argument regarding the timing of the remission. The order was pronounced on February 28, 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 697 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207592</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, confirming the addition of Rs. 1,78,74,364/- under Section 41(1)/28(iv) for AY 2007-08. The Tribunal held that the remission of liability, though not recognized as income from the project, was taxable as part of the trading activity. The Tribunal found that the remission accrued in the year under consideration and dismissed the assessee&#039;s argument regarding the timing of the remission. The order was pronounced on February 28, 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>