<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 18 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207575</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Regulations 8 and 15 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations 2004, the notification dated 8 April 2010, and the public notice issued on 15 June 2011. It found that the requirement for candidates who passed the examination under Regulation 9 of the 1984 Regulations to pass additional subjects under the 2004 Regulations was reasonable and necessary to ensure Customs House Agents possessed the required competencies and knowledge. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the regulatory framework&#039;s aim to upgrade CHAs&#039; skills and competencies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 18 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207575</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Regulations 8 and 15 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations 2004, the notification dated 8 April 2010, and the public notice issued on 15 June 2011. It found that the requirement for candidates who passed the examination under Regulation 9 of the 1984 Regulations to pass additional subjects under the 2004 Regulations was reasonable and necessary to ensure Customs House Agents possessed the required competencies and knowledge. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the regulatory framework&#039;s aim to upgrade CHAs&#039; skills and competencies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>