https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207573 Findings of misconduct against a Customs House Agent were upheld where the evidence showed sub-letting of the licence, failure to maintain statutory records, use of customs passes by non-employees, appearance by third-party personnel before customs authorities, and removal of goods through a different gate without authorisation. The Court treated these as factual findings not open to reappreciation in writ jurisdiction. Applying proportionality and the Wednesbury standard, it held that revocation of the licence and forfeiture of security were not illegal, irrational, perverse, or so disproportionate as to shock the conscience, and therefore declined interference. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207573 Findings of misconduct against a Customs House Agent were upheld where the evidence showed sub-letting of the licence, failure to maintain statutory records, use of customs passes by non-employees, appearance by third-party personnel before customs authorities, and removal of goods through a different gate without authorisation. The Court treated these as factual findings not open to reappreciation in writ jurisdiction. Applying proportionality and the Wednesbury standard, it held that revocation of the licence and forfeiture of security were not illegal, irrational, perverse, or so disproportionate as to shock the conscience, and therefore declined interference. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207573