<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 106 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207564</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Petition, finding that the Petitioner failed to make a full and true disclosure of all material facts necessary for the assessment. The reopening of the assessment by the Assessing Officer was deemed justified, with no grounds for the court to intervene under Article 226 of the Constitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 106 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207564</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Petition, finding that the Petitioner failed to make a full and true disclosure of all material facts necessary for the assessment. The reopening of the assessment by the Assessing Officer was deemed justified, with no grounds for the court to intervene under Article 226 of the Constitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>