<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 422 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207560</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the order dated 26th September 2008, and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication. The court emphasized that the petitioner society had complied with conditions under Section 10(23C)(vi) in the past. The respondent was directed to reconsider the application, potentially imposing new conditions and seeking an undertaking for compliance. No costs were awarded in the disposition of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 422 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207560</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the order dated 26th September 2008, and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication. The court emphasized that the petitioner society had complied with conditions under Section 10(23C)(vi) in the past. The respondent was directed to reconsider the application, potentially imposing new conditions and seeking an undertaking for compliance. No costs were awarded in the disposition of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>