<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 793 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207547</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the benefit of the notification could be claimed even if not previously raised in the proceedings. The judgment underscores the principle that exemptions can be availed by litigants at any stage if they are eligible under the law, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 793 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207547</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the benefit of the notification could be claimed even if not previously raised in the proceedings. The judgment underscores the principle that exemptions can be availed by litigants at any stage if they are eligible under the law, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>