<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 786 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207534</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the Tribunal was not justified in declining to stay the order-in-original dated 11th August, 2009, which determined ownership of a plot in a Government Industrial Estate. The Court found that if the plot was auctioned during the appeal process, it could cause grave prejudice to the appellants. Therefore, the Court stayed the operation of the order-in-original until the appeals were decided, directing the Tribunal to expedite the appeal hearings. The attachment imposed in 2005 remained in force during the appeals, with restrictions on the appellants&#039; dealings with the plot without written permission from the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 786 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207534</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the Tribunal was not justified in declining to stay the order-in-original dated 11th August, 2009, which determined ownership of a plot in a Government Industrial Estate. The Court found that if the plot was auctioned during the appeal process, it could cause grave prejudice to the appellants. Therefore, the Court stayed the operation of the order-in-original until the appeals were decided, directing the Tribunal to expedite the appeal hearings. The attachment imposed in 2005 remained in force during the appeals, with restrictions on the appellants&#039; dealings with the plot without written permission from the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>