<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 693 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207507</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, affirming the Respondent&#039;s entitlement to claim the drawback under Section 74 of the Customs Act. The Government emphasized strict interpretation of statutory provisions and notifications, rejecting the department&#039;s arguments. No evidence of fraud was found, and procedural errors were overlooked in favor of the Respondent. The Revision Application was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 693 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207507</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, affirming the Respondent&#039;s entitlement to claim the drawback under Section 74 of the Customs Act. The Government emphasized strict interpretation of statutory provisions and notifications, rejecting the department&#039;s arguments. No evidence of fraud was found, and procedural errors were overlooked in favor of the Respondent. The Revision Application was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>