https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207503 The Tribunal set aside the denial of modvat credit to the appellants based on allegedly fake invoices and remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for proper verification. The judge emphasized the need for a fair opportunity for the appellants to defend their case and directed the authority to consider the authenticity of the invoices issued by suppliers named in departmental alert Circulars. The decision highlighted procedural fairness and thorough verification in tax credit disputes, ensuring the appellants' right to present a defense was upheld. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207503 The Tribunal set aside the denial of modvat credit to the appellants based on allegedly fake invoices and remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for proper verification. The judge emphasized the need for a fair opportunity for the appellants to defend their case and directed the authority to consider the authenticity of the invoices issued by suppliers named in departmental alert Circulars. The decision highlighted procedural fairness and thorough verification in tax credit disputes, ensuring the appellants' right to present a defense was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207503