<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 769 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming duty, interest, and penalty amounting to Rs. 65,56,317 against the appellants for alleged evasion of duty payment. The decision was overturned due to insufficient evidence linking the traded goods to the manufacturing activity, prompting a fresh inquiry to ascertain the true nature of the goods before imposing any duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 769 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming duty, interest, and penalty amounting to Rs. 65,56,317 against the appellants for alleged evasion of duty payment. The decision was overturned due to insufficient evidence linking the traded goods to the manufacturing activity, prompting a fresh inquiry to ascertain the true nature of the goods before imposing any duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>