<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 370 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207498</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. The discrepancy in stock valuation found during the survey, the failure to substantiate the claim, and the deliberate act of enhancing the opening stock to nullify the effect of excess stock led to the conclusion that the assessee concealed income. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, confirming the levy of penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 370 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207498</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. The discrepancy in stock valuation found during the survey, the failure to substantiate the claim, and the deliberate act of enhancing the opening stock to nullify the effect of excess stock led to the conclusion that the assessee concealed income. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, confirming the levy of penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>