<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 172 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207495</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for charges paid without tax deduction, citing a precedent. Additionally, the Court affirmed the deletion of additions under section 37(1) for penalties imposed by the National Stock Exchange, as they were not due to any offense or violation of the law. The appeal was disposed of without costs, with judges J.P. Devadhar and K.K. Tated presiding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 172 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207495</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for charges paid without tax deduction, citing a precedent. Additionally, the Court affirmed the deletion of additions under section 37(1) for penalties imposed by the National Stock Exchange, as they were not due to any offense or violation of the law. The appeal was disposed of without costs, with judges J.P. Devadhar and K.K. Tated presiding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>