<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 716 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207477</link>
    <description>The court held that the Central Information Commission&#039;s decision to allow Mr. Kejriwal to access government appointment documents without following Section 11(1) of the RTI Act was not justified. The court set aside the CIC&#039;s order, restored Mr. Kejriwal&#039;s appeals for compliance with Section 11(1), dismissed Mr. Kejriwal&#039;s writ petition, and allowed the UOI&#039;s writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 716 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207477</link>
      <description>The court held that the Central Information Commission&#039;s decision to allow Mr. Kejriwal to access government appointment documents without following Section 11(1) of the RTI Act was not justified. The court set aside the CIC&#039;s order, restored Mr. Kejriwal&#039;s appeals for compliance with Section 11(1), dismissed Mr. Kejriwal&#039;s writ petition, and allowed the UOI&#039;s writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>