<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 397 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207476</link>
    <description>Customs house agents must maintain supervision over employees and remain responsible for acts or omissions committed in the course of business under the Licensing Regulations. On the facts found, the agent could not disclaim responsibility for the conduct of the person acting for the exporter, so the prohibition from functioning at the concerned customs station was upheld. An earlier order was held inapplicable because it addressed delay in suspension and compliance with Board norms, not the agent&#039;s culpability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 397 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207476</link>
      <description>Customs house agents must maintain supervision over employees and remain responsible for acts or omissions committed in the course of business under the Licensing Regulations. On the facts found, the agent could not disclaim responsibility for the conduct of the person acting for the exporter, so the prohibition from functioning at the concerned customs station was upheld. An earlier order was held inapplicable because it addressed delay in suspension and compliance with Board norms, not the agent&#039;s culpability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>