<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 101 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207466</link>
    <description>The court determined that the post of Vice President is a promotional post from that of a Member of the ITAT. It highlighted the higher responsibilities associated with the Vice President role, emphasizing the hierarchical structure within the ITAT. Regarding the authority to record Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs), the court held that the President of the ITAT lacked the power to write ACRs for Members, aligning with a previous judgment. The court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal&#039;s order, directing a reconsideration of the petitioner&#039;s claim by the Selection Committee without the disputed ACRs, to be completed within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 101 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207466</link>
      <description>The court determined that the post of Vice President is a promotional post from that of a Member of the ITAT. It highlighted the higher responsibilities associated with the Vice President role, emphasizing the hierarchical structure within the ITAT. Regarding the authority to record Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs), the court held that the President of the ITAT lacked the power to write ACRs for Members, aligning with a previous judgment. The court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal&#039;s order, directing a reconsideration of the petitioner&#039;s claim by the Selection Committee without the disputed ACRs, to be completed within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>