<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 8 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Ld. CIT(A) Faridabad&#039;s order for the assessment year 2004-05. The AO&#039;s rejection of the book result led to the estimation of income using an 8% gross profit rate. Disallowances made by the AO were deleted by the Ld. CIT(A), with the Tribunal upholding the decision based on past precedents. The consistent approach in earlier years and similarity in facts supported the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 8 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Ld. CIT(A) Faridabad&#039;s order for the assessment year 2004-05. The AO&#039;s rejection of the book result led to the estimation of income using an 8% gross profit rate. Disallowances made by the AO were deleted by the Ld. CIT(A), with the Tribunal upholding the decision based on past precedents. The consistent approach in earlier years and similarity in facts supported the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>