<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 791 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207454</link>
    <description>A settlement recorded before an arbitrator showed reciprocal obligations: one group relinquished and waived rights in certain properties and in the balance price receivable by the company, while the company assigned its rights in the properties covered by the settlement. On that basis, the arrangement disclosed real consideration flowing between the parties, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that consideration was wholly absent could not stand. The transaction was therefore not liable to be treated as a gift merely because of alleged absence of consideration, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 791 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207454</link>
      <description>A settlement recorded before an arbitrator showed reciprocal obligations: one group relinquished and waived rights in certain properties and in the balance price receivable by the company, while the company assigned its rights in the properties covered by the settlement. On that basis, the arrangement disclosed real consideration flowing between the parties, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that consideration was wholly absent could not stand. The transaction was therefore not liable to be treated as a gift merely because of alleged absence of consideration, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>