<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 669 - Kerala High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207453</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals by the Revenue due to tax effect being below the threshold. The Court held that unutilized capital gains were chargeable as income of the previous year, rejecting recomputation based on amended provisions. The Court affirmed the Assessing Officer&#039;s competence to demand tax on capital gains through prima facie adjustments and rectification, ruling against the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 669 - Kerala High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207453</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals by the Revenue due to tax effect being below the threshold. The Court held that unutilized capital gains were chargeable as income of the previous year, rejecting recomputation based on amended provisions. The Court affirmed the Assessing Officer&#039;s competence to demand tax on capital gains through prima facie adjustments and rectification, ruling against the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>