<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 578 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the value of bought-out items should be included in the assessable value of Centrifugal Machines. The appellants&#039; argument that these items were not integral parts of the machines was rejected. The Tribunal also allowed the cum-duty benefit claimed by the appellants and permitted the adjustment of duty already paid on bought-out items. No penalties were imposed on the appellants, as previous orders had concluded against it. The matter was remanded for re-computation of the duty, considering the adjustments and cum-duty treatment, with the appellants given a chance to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 578 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the value of bought-out items should be included in the assessable value of Centrifugal Machines. The appellants&#039; argument that these items were not integral parts of the machines was rejected. The Tribunal also allowed the cum-duty benefit claimed by the appellants and permitted the adjustment of duty already paid on bought-out items. No penalties were imposed on the appellants, as previous orders had concluded against it. The matter was remanded for re-computation of the duty, considering the adjustments and cum-duty treatment, with the appellants given a chance to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>