https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207436 The Tribunal disposed of the appellants' applications for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery due to lack of representation despite notice. The Commissioner confirmed customs duty demand, penalty, and fine on the appellants after de novo adjudication, citing fraudulent activities and non-compliance. The appellants faced penalties and cancellation of Letter of Permission for engaging in fraudulent activities, with the Tribunal upholding the penalties imposed. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellants' objections, directing a pre-deposit of 50% of the duty amount with the potential for waiver and stay upon compliance. en-us Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207436 The Tribunal disposed of the appellants' applications for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery due to lack of representation despite notice. The Commissioner confirmed customs duty demand, penalty, and fine on the appellants after de novo adjudication, citing fraudulent activities and non-compliance. The appellants faced penalties and cancellation of Letter of Permission for engaging in fraudulent activities, with the Tribunal upholding the penalties imposed. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellants' objections, directing a pre-deposit of 50% of the duty amount with the potential for waiver and stay upon compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207436