<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 98 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207425</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the case to the AO for a fresh decision. The AO was directed to consider the applicability of Rule 6DD(k) and apply the provisions of Section 40A(3) as they stood in the year the liability was incurred. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, granting the assessee an opportunity to present additional evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 01:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 98 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207425</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the case to the AO for a fresh decision. The AO was directed to consider the applicability of Rule 6DD(k) and apply the provisions of Section 40A(3) as they stood in the year the liability was incurred. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, granting the assessee an opportunity to present additional evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>