<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 394 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207410</link>
    <description>The Foreign Trade Policy, the Handbook of Procedures and the exemption notification under the Customs Act operate as a composite incentive scheme. The DGFT may prescribe procedural and implementational details under the Policy, but cannot amend it; here, the nexus requirement in paragraph 3.2.6A was treated as a supplementary measure enforcing the actual user condition already contained in the Policy and preventing misuse of the scheme. The corresponding restriction in the DFCE Certificate and the exemption notification were held to further the scheme rather than operate independently. The nexus condition was therefore upheld as valid and not ultra vires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 394 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207410</link>
      <description>The Foreign Trade Policy, the Handbook of Procedures and the exemption notification under the Customs Act operate as a composite incentive scheme. The DGFT may prescribe procedural and implementational details under the Policy, but cannot amend it; here, the nexus requirement in paragraph 3.2.6A was treated as a supplementary measure enforcing the actual user condition already contained in the Policy and preventing misuse of the scheme. The corresponding restriction in the DFCE Certificate and the exemption notification were held to further the scheme rather than operate independently. The nexus condition was therefore upheld as valid and not ultra vires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>