<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 735 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207405</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee was entitled to a refund of the excess duty paid due to an arithmetical mistake, as the burden was not passed on to the customer. The application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment was considered in light of these circumstances, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 735 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207405</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee was entitled to a refund of the excess duty paid due to an arithmetical mistake, as the burden was not passed on to the customer. The application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment was considered in light of these circumstances, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>