<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 683 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further examination regarding the tax liability and classification of services provided by the appellants. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the need for reassessment, particularly concerning contracts with Military Engineering Service and the applicability of service tax on specific activities within those contracts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 683 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further examination regarding the tax liability and classification of services provided by the appellants. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the need for reassessment, particularly concerning contracts with Military Engineering Service and the applicability of service tax on specific activities within those contracts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>