<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 679 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207376</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the shipping agents, including the Appellant, for their involvement in a fraudulent export scheme. The judgment highlighted the fraudulent nature of their actions, which facilitated the main fraudster in defrauding the government. Despite the Appellant&#039;s arguments regarding compliance with shipping conventions, the tribunal found their issuance of Bills of Lading post-delivery abroad indicative of fraudulent practices. The Appeal was rejected, affirming the penalties under Sections 113(d), 113(i), and 114 of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 679 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207376</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the shipping agents, including the Appellant, for their involvement in a fraudulent export scheme. The judgment highlighted the fraudulent nature of their actions, which facilitated the main fraudster in defrauding the government. Despite the Appellant&#039;s arguments regarding compliance with shipping conventions, the tribunal found their issuance of Bills of Lading post-delivery abroad indicative of fraudulent practices. The Appeal was rejected, affirming the penalties under Sections 113(d), 113(i), and 114 of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>