<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 661 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding both issues for fresh consideration. The first issue regarding the addition of Rs. 62,13,027 was remanded to the AO for recomputation of capital gains, while the second issue concerning the disallowance of Rs. 9,55,879 was remanded to the CIT(A) to verify the genuineness of the labour charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 661 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding both issues for fresh consideration. The first issue regarding the addition of Rs. 62,13,027 was remanded to the AO for recomputation of capital gains, while the second issue concerning the disallowance of Rs. 9,55,879 was remanded to the CIT(A) to verify the genuineness of the labour charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>