https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207344 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the validity of show cause notices and investigation of facts should be determined by the department authorities. The court emphasized that interference in notice issuance under Article 226 was inappropriate, directing the petitioners to address their grievances before the department. The judgment concluded that the petition lacked merit and was dismissed, with any observations made not prejudicing the department's investigation. en-us Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207344 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the validity of show cause notices and investigation of facts should be determined by the department authorities. The court emphasized that interference in notice issuance under Article 226 was inappropriate, directing the petitioners to address their grievances before the department. The judgment concluded that the petition lacked merit and was dismissed, with any observations made not prejudicing the department's investigation. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207344