<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 350 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207343</link>
    <description>Deemed credit under a conditional exemption notification was unavailable because the prescribed invoice declarations and lawful proof of duty payment were not satisfied; belated duty payment by the supplier and superintendent-issued certificates did not cure the defect, so the duty demand was sustained. Penalties under the excise rule could not be upheld in the absence of findings of fraud, wilful misstatement, collusion, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty; the penalties were therefore set aside. The document states that the appeals succeeded only on the penalty issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 350 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207343</link>
      <description>Deemed credit under a conditional exemption notification was unavailable because the prescribed invoice declarations and lawful proof of duty payment were not satisfied; belated duty payment by the supplier and superintendent-issued certificates did not cure the defect, so the duty demand was sustained. Penalties under the excise rule could not be upheld in the absence of findings of fraud, wilful misstatement, collusion, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty; the penalties were therefore set aside. The document states that the appeals succeeded only on the penalty issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>