<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the issue of Scrap Sales for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer under section 80IB(4). However, the claim for deduction for interest income on bank Fixed Deposits was rejected, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision that such income did not qualify for deduction under section 80IB. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 24th August 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the issue of Scrap Sales for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer under section 80IB(4). However, the claim for deduction for interest income on bank Fixed Deposits was rejected, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision that such income did not qualify for deduction under section 80IB. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 24th August 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>