<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 754 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions related to commission payments and the disallowance of Rs.1,75,000. The Tribunal found that the commission payments were genuine, supported by substantial evidence, and that the disallowance lacked concrete evidence. The Revenue failed to provide fresh material evidence contradicting the findings, leading to the dismissal of their appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 754 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions related to commission payments and the disallowance of Rs.1,75,000. The Tribunal found that the commission payments were genuine, supported by substantial evidence, and that the disallowance lacked concrete evidence. The Revenue failed to provide fresh material evidence contradicting the findings, leading to the dismissal of their appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>