<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 824 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207319</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Ombudsman&#039;s award. It ruled that the premium amount of Rs. 4,810/- was inclusive of service tax and that the insurer could not unilaterally impose additional charges. The court also ordered that any extra amount collected from the respondent should be adjusted towards future premiums.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 824 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207319</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Ombudsman&#039;s award. It ruled that the premium amount of Rs. 4,810/- was inclusive of service tax and that the insurer could not unilaterally impose additional charges. The court also ordered that any extra amount collected from the respondent should be adjusted towards future premiums.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>