https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207317 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, concluding that the impugned order was invalid due to lack of evidence supporting earlier service dates. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for consideration on the merits of the appeals. The appeals were deemed timely filed within the limitation period, requiring the Commissioner (Appeals) to address them substantively. en-us Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207317 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, concluding that the impugned order was invalid due to lack of evidence supporting earlier service dates. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for consideration on the merits of the appeals. The appeals were deemed timely filed within the limitation period, requiring the Commissioner (Appeals) to address them substantively. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207317